Talk:Consolidated B-32 Dominator

REFERENCES!!!

This article has no references whatsoever; please get someone onto this.

I have no idea where the original information came from, but I did extensive cl;eanup of the wording and verified what's left with the source produced.--Buckboard 12:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

This plane looks like a enlarged B-26 with 2 more engine and a taller vertical stabilizer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.50.2 (talk) 02:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Range

I deleted the last sentence in the lead because the statement did not seem compatible with the indicated range of the aircraft: 3,800 mi .--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 14:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Consolidated B-32 Dominator/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Solid B article. Gives a good overview of the Dominator's troubled development, its relationship to the B-29, and its very brief operational use. Pretty good article.

Last edited at 16:54, 11 June 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 12:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Consolidated B-32 Dominator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071114192909/http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil:80/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2535 to http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2535
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071114192909/http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil:80/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2535 to http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2535

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

So did the first one have turrets or not?

The text states that due to problems with the turrets, they were left off the first example. But then a few lines later it says the first one had all of these turrets. Which is correct? Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)