Talk:Conductive textile
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Do we need so many citations? Biscuittin 23:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Seems like it was either written entirely by this Amber company or edited to advertise their product. ~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.147.113.50 (talk) 20:26, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure if all these papers are 1) necessary and 2) actually about the subject matter, but I'll leave this to be sorted out by someone who knows more about the subject than I do. I'm just a passer-by. 83.84.190.118 (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, this article seems to need major improvement Statue2 (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Merge edit
I think portions of Smart textiles should be merged here, and part elsewhere. - PKM (talk) 05:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Conductive textile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100510215413/http://www.techexchange.com/thelibrary/smarttextiles.html to http://www.techexchange.com/thelibrary/smarttextiles.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)