Talk:Concordat of 2008

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Bias edit

This article basically does nothing except quote people who criticized the Concordat. NPOV tag added. 194.46.233.146 (talk) 21:51, 19 March 2011 (UTC).Reply

Fixing this stub edit

As is obvious by reading the page, and has been noted by another editor (vide supra), this page is heavily biased. Therefore, I suggest that it either be deleted and/or written using credible, reliable sources. Fictio-cedit-veritati (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

the references are wrongly marked as Spanish; there is a clear bias in text against the Concordat, and the claimed references are contradictory; eg, the text state that "Some congressmen wanted to change the concordat,[3]", while the pointed reference [3] main headline is "Tarso defends agreement with Vatican and says the project preserves the secular state"

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Concordat of 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply