Talk:Computable Document Format

File:Cdf logo th.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Cdf logo th.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Cdf logo th.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Open format

"CDF is a published public format[3] created by Wolfram Research."

This is misleading. While Wolfram Research implies CDF is an open format in the answer to their FAQ: "Is CDF an open file format?", in fact CDF does not meet the definition of Open format. A publicly available specification for the binary format of the CDF file is not available, preventing third parties from creating or reading these files without reverse engineering.

Unless I've missed a link to the binary format specification, CDF is a proprietary format pretending to be open.

Ipsuid (talk) 14:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

The binary format of the document is specified in the documentation at [1] for example the key structural elements are listed at [2]. One thing to realize is that the document is specified with an ASCII representation of the language description, so for example Notebook[{Cell["Hello world"]}] is both the language code for generating a document and is the contents of the file that is generated. JonMcLoone (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Impact

Seems that after five years in the wild, the CDF remains almost unknown. The article could do with a section describing what impact it has had, if any, in its various target markets. If it's effectively been a non-event - despite Wolfram's efforts - the question of notability needs to be addressed: Is the format worth following up in future, or will history relegate it to "footnote" status? Whatever the consensus, I see no point in deleting the article, if only to mark this attempt to create a new interactive document standard, perhaps before its time – although many a naysayer forecast an early death for Adobe's PDF format! yoyo (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Computable Document Format. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725121540/http://www.thinq.co.uk:80/2011/7/21/wolfram-punts-expanded-medium-technical-docs/ to http://www.thinq.co.uk/2011/7/21/wolfram-punts-expanded-medium-technical-docs/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)