Talk:Comproportionation

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2409:4063:6D1C:D6CC:0:0:1309:5703 in topic About the disc respiration reaction

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


SymproportionationComproportionation — More offical, more widely used, more correct etymologically. Physchim62 (talk) 13:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

To expand on the three reasons above:

  1. The IUPAC Gold Book lists both comproportionation and symproportionation as synonyms; however, comproportionation seems to be preferred, as you can see at the entry for disproportionation.
  2. Neither term is very widely used, but symproportionation gets 1,040 Google hits, while comproportionation gets 11,800.
  3. The term is the opposite of disproportionation (a much more widely used term). In Latin, the opposite of the prefix dis- is con-, with assimilation of the "n" to "m" before "p". The prefix syn- is the opposite of anti-.

Physchim62 (talk) 13:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Also, syn - as Wiktionary now says - is Greek; its rare use in Latin or with Latin roots in English will jar on some readers unless there is a clear reason or habit supporting it. I see none here. Support. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:29, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Support, yep, Google scholar confirms com- as much more common.--Kotniski (talk) 08:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Comproportionation/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article should be called comproportionation, since that word gives about 7000 google hits, vs 700 for synproportionation. 209.151.140.80 (talk) 23:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 01:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 12:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comproportionation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Comproportionation reactions without sources or need checking

edit
I2 + IF3 → 3 IF [1]
Ag + AgF → Ag2F [2]
  • At 400 °C, XeF
    4
    reacts with xenon to form XeF
    2
    :[1]
XeF4 + Xe → 2 XeF2 [3]
  • Uranium trifluoride can be obtained by reacting uranium(IV) fluoride with aluminium at 900 °C or with uranium:
 
 [4]

-- Ktsquare (talk) 21:07, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

About the disc respiration reaction

edit

Compress Pareshan reaction Hua reaction Hai jismein do molecule rahte hain donon mein se kam se Aate Hain Ijjat karte hain lekin product Mein Unka oxidation number alag alag hota hai samjhe Ki Nahin Agar Nahin samjhe do Prakar lagaunga pura Akad khane a jaega 2409:4063:6D1C:D6CC:0:0:1309:5703 (talk) 08:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference bard1985 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).