Talk:Comedo

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The outcome was do not merge.--kelapstick (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

---

• Oppose-- There are two types of comedones so they deserve separate articles. Steelbeard1 (talk) 17:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

But they are both types of comedones, which together, would not be a large article? kilbad (talk) 08:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose -- I also oppose this merge. Steelbeard1's concern is completely correct. Merging two related articles, into a single article, is usually a mistake. And it is much more of a mistake when the merge target implies conflation -- as it does in this particular case. Geo Swan (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I have removed the emrge tag from the pages as the discussion is moribund. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Major re-working

This stub was mostly based on non-reliable sources such as about.com. It didn't deal with key issues for teenagers and others such as whether or not to squeeze them, and what causes them. I've expanded it and re-written based on reliable secondary and tertiary sources. No longer a stub in my opinion - I think it's a candidate for good enough for this topic. Hildabast (talk) 16:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Wiktionary

I added the word noncomedogenic and explained it, and added a link to Wiktionary. Is there a particular way to use the Wiktionary in a WP article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hildabast (talk • contribs) 02:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

See Template:Wiktionary. Isheden (talk) 09:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! 98.233.38.200 (talk) 11:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Nevus com..

Hi - I'd overlooked one of the rare conditions I'd found and we've just had an editing conflict, but I need to quit for the night. So here's the bit:

Nevus comedonicus or comedo nevus is a benign hamartoma of the pilosebaceous unit around the oil-producing gland in the skin. It has widened open hair follicles with dark keratin plugs that resemble comedones.

Added this - and also found a mention of microcomedones on the Wikipedia acne page, linking back to this one. So I added an explanation and found an article on the development of comedones. Hildabast (talk) 12:25, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

References

Replace closeup of blackhead with anatomical "painting"?

Comedones

I don't think the macro of the blackhead is helpful - there's no oxidized black top to see, and it's more a round plug than the typical secreted blackhead. I've drawn/painted a diagram of the anatomy of comedones. Even though it's not an electronically-designed graphic, I think it might potentially be more useful than the rather confusing macro shot. (I tried to find a good open access graphic, but I couldn't). Hildabast (talk) 21:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

OK, ignore this people - I've checked it with a dermatologist and I'm going to re-do this. Hildabast (talk) 23:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

James, I can't delete this from Wikimedia Commons - only an administrator can. Could you do it please, since I'm going to re-do it? (Hywel answered all my questions about miniscule details, and I'm going to give it another go to get this anatomically correct, rather than just do one of the artist's impression style ones like this.) Thanks! Hildabast (talk) 16:45, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Photos of types of comedones

These two websites have photos of all kinds of comedones (not open access though). Note they are also a source of info on a wide variety of unusual skin conditions. Should we put them as external links for seeing photos of the conditions mentioned in the article, or is there another way to handle this? New Zealand Dermatological Society (there's a WP page about them as an organization) and the Primary Care Dermatological Society of the UK. Hildabast (talk) 21:55, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comedo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130615093140/http://cadd.whu.edu.cn/ditad/diseaseOMIMList/?page=879 to http://cadd.whu.edu.cn/ditad/diseaseOMIMList/?page=879

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 11 August 2017 (UTC)