Talk:Comandanti Medaglie d'Oro-class destroyer/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: L293D (talk · contribs) 14:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Really nice work here, getting an unreferenced stub to a detailed, accurate, and interesting article with really good images. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Image review

Image copyright looks good, though this is the first time I see this copyright template.

Source review

Every thing good, as usual.

Lead

Lead looks good, I might suggest that you expand it a bit if you want, with perhaps some technical info (main battery caliber, torpedo tubes).

Design

• whose ability to elevate to 45 degrees gave them a limited ability to deal with low-flying aircraft - just a detail, but could you clarify if the main battery's effectiveness against aircraft was better or worse than the preceding class. Does "limited" mean they had a limited ability to do something the previous class couldn't, or does it mean it's ability was limited compared to it predecessors?
  • None of my references mention any ability of the earlier destroyers to engage aircraft aircraft at all. Since it's not mentioned I can't source any kind of comparison so I had to leave it out. 45° of elevation for these ships only allows the engagement of low-level aircraft at best.
• Do we have the range of the torpedoes?
  • Added.

The rest looks good. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the review; see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Looks good, but could clarify what " for SI 270 torpedoes" means? The DD carried 270 torpedoes on board? L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

That's the name of the torpedo.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Okay, great! L293D (☎ • ✎) 03:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.