Talk:Colegio Nuestra Senora de la Antigua
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Colegio Nuestra Senora de la Antigua article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editPeer Review from Leah Bury
What does the article (or section) do well?
This article does a good job of providing information in an ordered fashion that is non-biased/neutral. The order that the information is presented in is logical and cohesive. This article also does a good job of linking to other Wikipedia pages to help inform readers who know less about the topic or the subject matter.
- I generally agree with Leah's comments. I thought you did a good job creating the structure of this article, which was really easy to follow, and everything was fact based and told in an unbiased tone. You also did a good job incorporating pictures and external links where applicable. StefanO (talk) 03:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
What changes would you suggest overall?
I am not sure if you intend to finish writing them, but the sections Alumni and Education are incomplete. You should either fill in these sections or delete them. Without them, I feel that the article would feel a bit incomplete, so I would fill them out. In addition, and further information you can provide about the school in the present day would be good and would make the coverage of the topic feel more full. Finally, there are no real in-text citations or references that tell where you got this information from. You should work on including those as well as a finished References/Bibliography section.
- I'm assuming you are going to add the Alumni and Education section later. Not sure if the school has an athletic department, but may suggest adding that if applicable. I would also suggest creating an overview section prior to the history section. Here you can discuss the school today in greater detail (would suggest moving the contemporary portion to this section). StefanO (talk) 03:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution?
Ensure that the article is complete and that nothing is left unfinished, and ensure that you are properly citing your references.
- I think it is just continuing to add more information and making tweaks. The general structure is good, but I think the school as it stands today is missing information. If you add an overview section, as well as add the information to the Alumni and Education section, I think this article will be in great shape! StefanO (talk) 03:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know!
This topic does not really relate to my topic at all but it was still very interesting!
- Topic doesn't relate to my article at all, but I liked your use of subsections. StefanO (talk) 03:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ana Estrada.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)