Talk:Code folding

GFA BASIC

Section added. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 12:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

As mentioned, quite an old 'IDE' using CodeFolding is GFA BASIC, mentioned as '"collapse" a procedure' in the article Oyd11 22:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, as well as the famous old "Quick Basic" from Microsoft ;)

Hibou57 | 22:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Token-based vs User-specified

Hello,

The section about conventions, talks about token-based and user-specified. But the fact is that token-based is the implementation of user-specified folding, so perhaps the page should just talks about user-specified, giving a note telling that user-specified use tokens inside the source.

In my own way of understanding things, there are two types of folding editors :

• Passive folding (the editor generate folding automaticaly while parsing the code)
• Active folding (the user decide what folding will be)

An editor may permit both (as do Leo, for which one I've just added a link in the bottom of the page)

What do you think about the remark concerning token-based vs user-specified ?

Regards,

Hibou57 | 22:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

While in a sense you're right, I still think they should be considered distinct from each other. Although I could understand changing the list so user-specified has two subsections: token-based and and anonymous, or something like that. -- Heptite (T) (C) (@) 06:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

User specified folding in Eclipse

The page states that user specified folding is a feature of eclipse. I haven't found it though. For java code, the only folding I have found is syntax based. No user specified, token based or intdention based folding as far as I have seen. Is the text on this wiki page really accurate? Are there any references that can verify this, if not, I think it should be removed? 89.253.76.62 (talk) 22:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Since noone has given any reference to other types of code folding in eclipse than syntax based, and I have searched and not found any code folding other than syntax based, I have changed the text on the page 89.253.76.62 (talk) 20:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

XCode token-based folding

In the table it lists XCode as having token-based folding as a feature, but as far as I'm aware that's not the case. What is the delimiter for this? --mikechen (talk) 03:32, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Folding in Word Processors

It seems appropriate to me that there be mentions of the following facts:

  * Some word processors support (text) folding (but, because code is text, they also support code folding.  Microsoft Word calls it (or, at least, used to call it) "collapsible outlining", which, I believe should be in the text so that it can be found during a search.
  * Libre / Free <something> Office supports the essentials of collapsible outlining by providing a feature that displays only the headings of a document at various levels. 

Rhkramer (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Code folding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061223230643/http://www.outliners.com/ to http://www.outliners.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)