Talk:Claytonia virginica

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 173.212.68.100 in topic Mix-up Claytonia virginica & Claytonia caroliniana

Start

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Claytonia virginica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Mix-up Claytonia virginica & Claytonia caroliniana

edit

There appears some mix-up: Claytonia caroliniana has a more northerly distribution than Claytonia virginica, but here is is the opposite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.212.68.100 (talk) 19:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply