Talk:Cistus ladanifer

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Dayfield

I think this image is not Cistus ladanifer. It is - may be - Cistus laurifolius. --Gnomon Kelemen 09:19, August 12, 2005 (UTC)

Changed to a different pic - MPF 17:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is this really an ornamental plant? It is just about the ugliest plant you can find, except the one week during which it flowers a year.--Burgas00 17:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

The basic ladanifer is indeed a bit gawky. However, the sulcatus variety (the cistus formerly known as C.palhinhae) is very attractive, compact and quite frost-resistant (here in England anyway) and the appearance of the spectacular flowers (albeit briefly as you say) is the icing on the cake. Dayfield (talk) 19:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

What are the medicinal uses of the cistus ladanifer? Please not the uses in perfumery, just the medicinal ones. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.74.232 (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply