Talk:Circulatory collapse

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Prinsgezinde in topic The elephant in the room

Merge with Shock

edit

This article is somewhat confusing. It seems to try to be abstract, differentiating itself from shock by allowing for the deficit to be due to the provision of nutrients and/or removal of metabolites. However, if the deficit is in provision of nutrients other than related to shock, i.e. hypoxia but not removal of metabolites (type 1 respiratory failure) or removal of metabolites again other than shock i.e. type 2 respiratory failure.... neither have anything to do with "circulatory collapse". The circulation is working as intended. The content of the article simply lists causes of shock (as well as shock itself) as causes of circulatory collapse. Bizarre! It is of generally low quaility, perhaps it should simply redirect to shock? Maybe it is of historic value i.e. an outdated concept superceeded by shock 92.40.174.222 (talk) 23:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Peripheral should link to either one of the two: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripheral_nervous_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripheral_vision

I'm not sure which one, though, as i'm unsure if "peripheral" is a reference to a problem the nervous system, or a symptom that may occur in your peripheral vision — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.184.179.106 (talk) 13:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Neither are relevant here - it's referring to peripheral blood vessels. 81.187.1.83 (talk) 02:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

The elephant in the room

edit

Nowhere on the page does it specify if the condition can cause death. It seems reasonable considering it's called "circulatory collapse", but death is neither mentioned nor implied anywhere in the lead or the "Effects" section. Prinsgezinde (talk) 21:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply