Talk:Circular reasoning

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2013; 2014;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Learn more about this page

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Logic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

This article was selected as the article for improvement on 30 September 2013 for a period of one week.

Feinberg and Shafer-Landau example not circular reasoning edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

imo the statement "using scientific reasoning to prove scientific reasoning is circular reasoning" is not circular, only tautological. (circular reasoning is *defined* as using X to prove X) Awelotta (talk) 15:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic