Talk:Chuck Versus the Push Mix

Image

Just a note about this revision: According to this discussion, an image must illustrate a visual detail that is explicitly commented upon, such that the visual illustration is necessary to understand the comment in the text. As this "critical commentary" is in the "critical response" section, User:Future Perfect at Sunrise told me the image (we were actually discussing File:ChuckGobbler.jpg) should be in that section or there should be a well-designed caption that establishes the link somehow. This is just heads-up. I don't have a strong opinion either way. --Boycool (talk) 22:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

I would agree with this more for an in-line image in the article, but considering Infobox data tends to be concise and of significance to the article (IE, why we keep removing insignificant and/or one-shot aliases from the Infoboxes for Chuck and Sarah) I would argue that the caption for images in the Infobox should likewise be restricted to a simple explanation of the scene depicted. Ambaryer (talk) 23:43, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

The hospital seems REALLY familiar to me... Is it from Scrubs? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.129.11.185 (talk) 12:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

The hospital was on Chuck before. Ellie and Awesome work there. --Boycool (talk) 13:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Grammar

What's the policy for having quote marks within quote marks? --Boycool (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Stylistically, one would use single quotes. I may have missed that the episode titles were being given within a quote.... Ambaryer (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

I'll revert it to the single quotes then. Thanks. --Boycool (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)