Talk:Chu (river)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Comment

edit

Kazakh spelling of river is Shu. Chu is the russian, Chuy or Chui the kyrgyz spelling. It should be Shu river. Alibek2030 (talk) 15:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's important not simply to change any internal links from Chu River to Shu River without attention to consequences, because now the link Shu River guides to a text about a river called "Shu" in China, which is not at all related to this river. So if there would be a decision to change the name of this article, all the links would have to be changed to "Shu River (China)" and "Shu River (Kyrgyzystan and Kazakhstan)" or less clumsy "Shu River (Central Asia)" ... but mayby the title "Chu River", though it reminds of Russian, nevertheless is shorter and more practical. Certainly it's a fact that only the first 115 kilometres are in Kyrgyzystan, then for 221 kilometres the river is the border between Kyrgyzystan and Kazakhstan, and the last 731 kilometres are in Kazakhstan (and no single kilometre is in Russia). ThomasPusch (talk) 11:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chu River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply