Talk:ChuChu Rocket!/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 12:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Don't feel obligated but I'm looking for comments on my current peer review if you're interested. Freikorp (talk) 12:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   "lead mice into their rockets" - the use of the word 'their' raises the question of why they have rockets, also it isn't clear at this stage what the rockets do (they could be a weapon to use on the cats), how about simply 'lead mice into escape rockets'? I'm open to alternate wording.

   I agree that's the best way to say it, fixed

   Wikilink Private server in the lead

   Done

   Wikilink sprites; non-gamers won't know what this means

   Done

   "He noted there are two trends" - this is his opinion. As per WP:WORDS i'd replace "noted" with "stated" or another neutral term

   I am bad about doing that, fixed

   Wikilink Wii U

   Done

   "hook up 4 Game Boy Advances" - '4' should be spelt out as 'four'

   Done

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   There's inconsistency in the references. I.e some publications are spelt out (PlanetDreamcast) whereas others are given with the url (www.dreamcastlive.net, sega.jp). Replace the url formatted ones.

   Fixed url ones

   I'd format 'ChuChu Rocket! credits. Sega, 1999' with Template:Cite video game

   Done

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   There's one [citation needed] tag. Obviously the preceding sentence needs to be cited or removed.

   I cannot find a source. I think the image stands fine on its own to explain this. Removed.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Looks pretty good overall. Placing on hold until issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 12:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

   @Freikorp: Responded TarkusAB^talk 16:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

   Looks good. Happy for this to pass now. Freikorp (talk) 23:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)