Talk:Chloe O'Brian

2005

Behnood, please use the sandbox if you want to experiment. Don't create empty or near empty articles and then remove the delete tags once someone catches them. Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia, but you need to focus your energy on constructive efforts. Fernando Rizo 02:27, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

As the character is a major part of the show 24, it warranted a page. No offense to the previous writer, but much of the information contained within was essentially a synopsis of the first four episodes of season 5, and needed an extensive overhaul. The page is still nowhere near the quality of the pages for Jack Bauer and the other characters.--Toquinha 06:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

JJ72

I'm removing this part. This more belogns on the 24 (TV series) page than it does here. --Toquinha 17:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

I believe that this entry would be improved by a discussion of Chloe's friendship and working relationship with Edgar Stiles.

What's wrong with the promotional picture?

It looks much better. 154.20.217.225 17:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

I disagree! That picture makes Chloe O'Brian look like a fox. In the TV show, she is anything but that! That promo picture doesn't not capture the essense of Chloe O'Brian: she is charming in her own odd and special way.

I hate to say it, but I think that picture does make Chloe look too hot, a screengrab from the show might be better Tomgreeny 22:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree, screen grab of Chloe fixing Nina's virus in the Server room, or in busy scene in Com would make more sense for her characterTbklt (talk) 10:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Seasons

Why does this article on the whole menton nothing about Days 3 & 4, especially not in the detail of Day 5? Algebra man 21:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Stephen King

How does what he say in his review have anything to do with Jack and Chloe. I know he's talking about Chloe but where do you get anything about Jack. Maybe it's just me, I don't even understand about that John Wayne quote.-68.51.147.38 20:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Chloe6.jpg

Image:Chloe6.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Project Chloe

This has nothing to do with the show or the character, I think it should be removed. Blackbirdsky13 (talk) 06:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC

I agree Project Chloe should be removed. Maybe a separate article --Blue Tie (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

I think it should stay because it relates to the character. Now if it was something about Mary-Lynn Rajskub, then I think it would be appropriate to put it on another page. enzo32ferrari (talk) 2200 hours MST 27th May 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 05:00, 28 May 2010 (UTC).

Personality Disorder

Article should mention that she has a personality disorder --Blue Tie (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Not! Everyone else is abnormal, not Chloe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.43.227 (talk) 20:59, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Citations

This article is full of factual assertions with no supporting citations. 68.48.72.162 (talk) 02:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chloe O'Brian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309225549/http://www.ugo.com/tv/best-tv-nerds to http://www.ugo.com/tv/best-tv-nerds
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100109220838/http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2008/07/03/chloe-temporari/ to http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2008/07/03/chloe-temporari/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)