Talk:ChickensHits

Latest comment: 16 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic Fair use rationale for Image:Chickenhits.jpg

Untitled edit

If you (Originalsinner in your edit notes) want to whinge about removing empty info boxes - populate the things instead of placing an empty box for it to be done by someone else later Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 10:13, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Well how about getting off your high horse before I shoot it. Or here's an idea... try, I don't know... googling it and doing it yourself or maybe that just too strenuous. Here's the link for you [1]. And maybe taking a look at the "billions" of other albums and singles that have way less then what I put in the articles and have infoxboxes in them. So bite me. Originalsinner 19:00, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Chickenhits.jpg edit

 

Image:Chickenhits.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply