Talk:Checkmk
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Untitled edit
Thank you for all the criticism and input in the notability discussion and for keeping the article in.
188.174.210.73 (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Untitled edit
Still working on the formatting. Please bear with me. 23:51, 12 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fheigl (talk • contribs)
Untitled edit
citation for perf improvement: http://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/2863067-nagios-monitoring-performance http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/Nagios-Balancing-passive-and-active-checks (refers to book network monitoring with nagios) http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/nagioscore/4/en/tuning.html official nagios documentation saying to use passive checks at all costs.
idk if it needs a citation if it's even in the official documents. But if it makes people happy. 2001:A60:1C52:FE01:20B1:435:8F60:C0CF (talk) 17:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
POV issues edit
This reads like a press release, and uses business buzzwords all around to highlight the "benefits" the system provides.
It doesn't talk about limitations of the system and doesn't offer comparisons to other systems.
It also mixes features of OS and proprietary editions, despite them being slightly different. 2A02:6B8:B081:B48A:0:0:1:10 (talk) 13:42, 2 August 2022 (UTC)