Talk:Checklist of UK recorded Ichneumonidae

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Checklist of UK recorded Ichneumonidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725073724/http://iris.biosci.ohio-state.edu/catalogs/ichneumonids/ to http://iris.biosci.ohio-state.edu/catalogs/ichneumonids/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Accuracy

No source is given for the list. As just one example of issues, it includes Trigonalis hahnii which as of February 2022 the online NBN Atlas here gives as a synonym of Pseudogonalos hahnii and places in a different family, Trigonalidae. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Does this help ?

https://bdj.pensoft.net/article/9042/ 157.157.114.8 (talk) 13:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

New user, so tell me if I have done something wrong!

But I added the link (I posted without logging in in comment above).

This is such a complex and speciose family, there will doubtless be species on the list I have linked to for whom the names are now considered junior synonyms, or are in any case subject to debate. NBN is not a good authority on the more complex UK insect taxa in my experience, as it's often not up to date. Regardless, given there is a broader link for the list now, I presume better to query individual species rather than the entire list, moving forward? So will remove the flag from the top of the article. Samtreesandbushes (talk) 14:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)