Talk:Chardi kala

Merger of Chardi kala and Chardikala

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was merge Chardikala into this article (Caṛdī kalā). -- Robnpov (talk) 22:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

There appears to be two duplicate entries on this same topic. However, I am not an expert on the subject area so before making the edit, I wanted to determine which page should be kept and which should be changed into a redirect.

As far as I can tell, "Chardi kala" is correct as two separate words, rather than "Chardikala" as a single word? If I am correct, then "Chardi kala" should be the destination of the merge. "Chardikala" should be merged into it.

Note that "Chardi kala" itself is a redirect to the main article

Robnpov 22:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

As a sikh disciple I would concur that both spellings do in fact refer to the same idea/concept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.60.99 (talk) 00:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Excellent, thank you for your input. I also now realise that the article Chardikala was actually created from this one! I have now merged the articles and replaced Chardikala with a redirect. Robnpov (talk) 22:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Reason for non-standard spelling?

Hi, I just want to know why the non-standard spelling is used, esp. since for most people the easier one will do. If no satisfactory answer is given, we may revert to "chardi kala" and be happy & positive about it. elpincha (talk) 13:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

atrocious

this is an appallingly-written article. its rhetorical mumbojumbo that doesn't explain the concept whatsoever. it needs complete rewriting. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC) just one more thing: the use of bold type has to be avoided in every sentence, and if anything is left after wikifying, it should be placed under adequate sections. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

It should read "without enmity (animosity)

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

"They also believe that God is without enemies (nirvair)"

This is wrong, it should read that God is without enmity (animosity) We do not see God as vengeful or bitter. As it is written now is very wrong and makes no sense, can somebody please correct it, as I don't know how. Thank you. 2601:803:C600:790:A058:C0D6:917B:FE43 (talk) 16:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)