Talk:Chamba, Himachal Pradesh/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Dr. Blofeld in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 16:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Will be reviewing soon. Pyrotec (talk) 16:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive but eminently readable and informative article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    Well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Well referenced.
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Well illustrated.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Well illustrated.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

This article is well on its way towards WP:FAC. I'm awarding it GA-status. Congratulations on bringing this article up to the required qaulity standards. Pyrotec (talk) 12:16, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thankyou Pyrotec. Dr. Blofeld White cat 10:50, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply