Talk:Chaghaniyan

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Asia portal Chaghaniyan is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Uzbekistan portal This article is supported by WikiProject Uzbekistan (assessed as Low-importance).

Merger proposal edit

Latest comment: 7 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I propose merging Principality of Chaghaniyan into Chaghaniyan. Although the articles were created separately and co-evolved independently, at the moment Principality of Chaghaniyan (created in April 2014) is a WP:REDUNDANTFORK of Chaghaniyan (created in 2006). Apart from the "Muhtajid rule and aftermath" section, there are no major differences between the articles. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 17:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oppose Not necessary in my opinion. Principality of Chaghaniyan is a particular polity in the region of Chaghaniyan, a region with a broader history. We wouldn't benefit from mixing the two. पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 20:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Closing, given the uncontested objection with no support and stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 18:49, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply