Talk:Central Coast Roosters
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Merge proposal
editThe Central Coast Rip, Central Coast Storm and Central Coast Centurions are all essentially the same team with the same coach and home groun. They just have a different supporting club and they should share an article that talks about the Rip and Storm in the history section. Mattlore (talk) 19:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
No, i don't think they should be merged. They are different clubs affiliated with different NRL teams. From the same region, yes but they are completely different clubs. It'd be like saying the Gold Coast Titans page should be merged with the Gold Coast Chargers page. Josh the newcastle fan (talk) 10:57, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, both are the same team, and it’s not like Titans and Chargers, it’s more like how Giants, Seagulls and Chargers are all one article, in this case the Central Coast Storm only changed their name to Centurions because they ended their relationship with the Melbourne Storm in 2009 as explained in the Central Coast Storm's history.--sss333 (talk) 10:05, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 | Text and/or other creative content from Central Coast Storm was copied or moved into Central Coast Centurions with this edit on 12:50, 4 November 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Central Coast Centurions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100211194807/http://rleague.com/db/article.php?id=30457 to http://www.rleague.com/db/article.php?id=30457
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100102193045/http://rleague.com/db/content/92000/92112.php to http://www.rleague.com/db/content/92000/92112.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100103120038/http://rleague.com/db/index.php?id=92123 to http://www.rleague.com/db/index.php?id=92123
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100114053207/http://rleague.com/db/article.php?id=34103 to http://www.rleague.com/db/article.php?id=34103
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110311033548/http://nswrl.com.au/default.aspx?s=nswc-clubs-centurians to http://nswrl.com.au/default.aspx?s=nswc-clubs-centurians
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC)