This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some[who?]Romanian historians including Vasile Pârvan, consider the Caucones to be in close connection to the later-mentioned Dacian tribe bearing the same name. Archeologicall evidence of eastern and central Romania dating from the 12th century BC show the existence of the well developed Noua - Coslogeni - Sabatinovka archeologicall culture (considered by most archeologist to be proto-thracian), directly derived from the previous MonteoruBronze Age culture, having strong connections whith the balcano-anatolian cultures of theyr time.
"Some Romanian historians including Vasile Pârvan, consider the Caucones to be in close connection to the later-mentioned Dacian tribe bearing the same name." This gesturing does not actually transmit any information. Who beside Pârvan? What does "close connection" mean? What later mention? In what context?--Wetman04:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
