Talk:Catamenial pneumothorax

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2021 and 14 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aollhoff13. Peer reviewers: Minikiwis.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2021 and 20 November 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Olivetabasco. Peer reviewers: Teyofi.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hello, fellow Wikipedians. I am a 4th-year medical student and I am performing a peer evaluation on another 4th-year medical student's edits to this page.

Lead

You made significant contributions to the lead, expanding it. The part defining catamenial pneumothorax ("Catamenial pneumothorax is defined as at least two episodes...) is very helpful however I think it may be a but over detailed when you get into the definition of endometriosis- I suggest linking to the relevant pages if possible.

Context

Briefly mentioned before, but linking to other pages on Wikipedia may be helpful for the reader trying to gain more insight into the other terminology used in the article.

Tone and Balance

Your writing remains neutral and unbiased.

Sources and References

There are some lapses where citations can be added. If you are using the same citation, then just cite it. Your articles on review seem to come from peer-reviewed journals, which is great.

Overall Impressions

Your article is coming along nicely. I would suggest expanding your medical info box on the right of the page with some subheaders such as "symptoms," "risk factors," "diagnostic methods," "differential diagnosis," and "treatment."

Teyofi (talk) 17:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your suggested edits. I agree with your feedback and have made the edits suggested and feel that they have improved the article. Thank you for taking the time to evaluate my work!

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catamenial pneumothorax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100530093329/http://www.blebbusters.com/ to http://www.blebbusters.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Article Evaluation

Question	Comments
Initial analysis of the article?	This is a C-class article so there is room for improvement and expansion The tone is neutral and appropriate The article is lacking sufficient content and there are areas that are outdated or missing information Some information is outdated or lacking sources
Overall organization?	Well-organized but lacking important information
What will you change/add?	Overall, increase the amount of content Update management, treatment, diagnosis
Which sections will you prioritize?	Changes and additions will be made to each section

copyvio

This paper https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09750-0 (full paper with paywall https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s12109-020-09750-0?sharing_token=-Kdjc4Vwp59b3KZ6uHgDave4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY4zL2q_VjfJmW6twqPCXJPXlqW5_aE7qZ7HWX3KWOmI1rC75-j9MEV2tAZ8OTJF9lboVHukkDv5VdfLmO0zcnoLBg8bHnV0lkHKl54JJc8mrfhI3-WubEpLDKrsjp-W8dg%3D) mentioned plagiarism in this article,
It was confirmed with this tool: https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Catamenial+pneumothorax&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0
LaMèreVeille (talk) 14:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)