| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The section on Shiv Chopra seems redundant since it is already covered under "Canadian Human Rights Commission free speech controversies." I propose that it be deleted - the link to the free speech controversies page should be enough. Toby32225 (talk) 22:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
The deleted statement does not seem directly related to the Tribunal. Courts/tribunals do not typically provide legal support, etc. to respondents in civil matters. Perhaps this is a critique more relevant to the Human Rights Legal Support Centre? Also, it's less applicable where the respondent is the government or a large corporation. Maybe the statement could be reframed with respect to situations where the respondent is a small business or private individual? Either way, it seems a bit out of place for an encyclopedic entry. Toby32225 (talk) 17:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)