Talk:Campanula rotundifolia

National Flower of Scotland?

I always thought that the Thistle was the national flower of Scotland, but the article on Common Bluebell says that this flower is also considered to be the national flower of Scotland. It's not mentioned in the article on Scotland... --Bardcom (talk) 16:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Campanula rotundifolia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928014233/http://wisplants.uwsp.edu/scripts/detail.asp?SpCode=CAMROT to http://wisplants.uwsp.edu/scripts/detail.asp?SpCode=CAMROT

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Campanula rotundifolia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150430170312/http://www.plantlife.org.uk/wild_plants/county_flowers/ to http://www.plantlife.org.uk/wild_plants/county_flowers/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Taxonomic Disagreement

The issue appears to be that POWO is dividing Campanula rotundifolia into separate species where other most sources are not.

It looks like this may be a divide between different academic groups with papers and books from Eurasia more often using these species names while in North America there seems to be a firm consensus that Campanula rotundifolia is one species with just subspecies or varieties in N. America. Since we follow POWO here on wikipedia as the broadest source for accepted botanical species names, it is important that we use their information. However, in a case like this we should also note that they are alone or nearly alone in this usage, especially in papers written in the English speaking world.

Here are the numbers I have found:

• Campanula alaskana - 4 results since 2010 on Google Scholar, 0 papers on JSTOR
• Campanula giesekiana - 7 results since 2010 on Google Scholar, 0 papers on JSTOR
• Campanula intercedens - 4 results since 2010 on Google Scholar, 0 papers on JSTOR
• Campanula kladniana - 63 results since 2010 on Google Scholar, 0 papers on JSTOR
• Campanula macrorhiza - 18 results since 2010 on Google Scholar, 1 paper on JSTOR
• Campanula moravica - 52 results since 2010 on Google Scholar, 1 paper on JSTOR
• Campanula nejceffii - 1 result since 2010 on Google Scholar, 0 papers on JSTOR
• Campanula petiolata - 1 result since 2010 on Google Scholar, 0 papers on JSTOR
• Campanula ruscinonensis - 1 result since 2010 on Google Scholar, 0 papers on JSTOR
• Campanula willkommii - 6 results since 2010 on Google Scholar, 0 papers on JSTOR

I'm currently thinking about how exactly to word this to present a neutral encyclopedic point of view. MtBotany (talk) 19:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)