Talk:Campanian
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Tables
editI would replace "Description" with a more precise systematics placement. Because contributors will hardly be able to resist the temptation to put "just another bit of info" into "Description", defeating the purpose (conciseness) of having a table. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 09:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Brachylophosaurus
editShould Brachylophosaurus be included in this list? According to its article, it lived 75 million years ago. Rlendog (talk) 01:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Iberomesornis seems out of place too. 97.104.210.67 (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Good catch, I've removed it. Dinoguy2 (talk) 16:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Campanian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100822060927/http://www.stratigraphy.org/bak/geowhen/stages/Campanian.html to http://www.stratigraphy.org/bak/geowhen/stages/Campanian.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040511104934/http://norges.uio.no/timescale/Fig18.1_Cret_colA.pdf to http://norges.uio.no/timescale/Fig18.1_Cret_colA.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 29 July 2017 (UTC)