Talk:Caesalpinia pulcherrima

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Emjackson42 in topic Content on supposed Indian medicine
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caesalpinia pulcherrima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Content on supposed Indian medicine

edit

@Zefr, please explain why you keep reverting my edits. I would like to know why you don't believe a scientific publication is an appropriate resource when what it claims is that the plant is used for a purpose. That's a fairly easy claim to support, no? Here is the reference you keep removing:

Known as "Guletura" in India, the leaves, flower, bark, and sees of C. pulcherrima are used in Indian medicine. The bark and leaves have traditionally both used as abortifacients, while other parts of the plant are considered tonics and stimulants.[1]

To remove this information is to remove meaning from Wikipedia, which I don't believe is in keeping with the practices or ethos of this project. Emjackson42 (talk) 19:11, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Sharma, Vivek; Rajani, G.P. (2011). "Evaluation of Caesalpinia pulcherrima Linn. for anti-inflammatory and antiulcer activities". T. 43 (2): 168–171. doi:10.4103/0253-7613.77354. ISSN 0253-7613. Retrieved 22 February 2019.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

The Indian Journal of Pharmacology is not a reliable source, having a very low impact factor. Information in the Sharma article is preliminary and not reliable. For medical content, Wikipedia requires high-quality reviews, as discussed in WP:MEDRS. --Zefr (talk) 19:57, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Zefr Thank you for clarifying. Emjackson42 (talk) 20:08, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply