| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CNEOS 2014-01-08 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Planet nine
editA single encounter of a small object with only a rough number known for it's mass with a lager object of unknown mass, as good as unknown position, at atotally unknow distance and angle towards the eclipitic, and that preprint talks about "statistics"? --46.232.229.52 (talk) 13:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Skepticism
editarXiv:2211.02305 SevenSpheres (talk) 02:46, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Between the claims of alien technology, Planet Nine interactions, and denser than iron meteors (due to the assumption that it had to have an excess velocity at infinity), for all we know the recovered spherules could be a form of human pollutant such as fly ash/slag. This whole article is based on speculation and sensationalism. If you look hard enough you will find iron micrometeorites on your roof. --- Kheider (talk)