Talk:Brown-brown

Latest comment: 14 years ago by 189.237.226.87 in topic No crime

No crime edit

(The original poster left no headline. I made up one. --Netizen 22:09, 11 April 2006 (UTC))Reply
I removed the crime tag(s) on this article becasue it can be argued that drug use is not criminal, especially under the laws of the nations where this activity primarily takes place.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.82.227 (talkcontribs) 21:09, 11 April 2006 (See diff)

I think a "recreational drugs" stubs category might be best. Then again I don't even know if this drug really exists as I've only seen it used in "Lord of War". Cheers, Netizen 22:13, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
-I agree with the recreational drug use stub, however I have no knowledge of how to add such a tag. Thanks for cleaning up and formatting the talk page.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.188.131.156 (talkcontribs) 17:25, 15 April 2006

"Consumed by inhalation, the drug has no different effects from regular cocaine, as the addition of gunpowder largely serves to add to an aura of toughness, though it may create a psychosomatic effect upon the user." Is not correct it's being sniffed, like cocaine, not inhaled. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.153.128.137 (talkcontribs) 11:04, 16 April 2006

There is no way this should be included as either a criminal drug or a recreational drug. Beah claims that this drug was only given by military leaders before battles as a means to manipulate children. That implies regional legality and coercion. Mvblair 22:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm a person who has tried the Brown Brown, i do it only for pleasure, everybody tells me that i've should not try it, but, i decided to do it, and if you're thinkin' about how it feels, please, don't try, is better for you to hear me, is the worst of the trips i've ever experienced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.237.226.87 (talk) 15:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply