Talk:Brookfield East High School

You can always ask for a third view? welcome Victuallers 14:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Senior Lounge

• Why should the senior lounge be part of the article?
• Why should the senior lounge be part of the article?

"Non-notable"

• In regards to what BaronLarf deleted, I think that the present information is relevant to the information about Brookfield East High School. Wikipedia is not paper, and I think that we should include anything that contributes to the information about BEHS. --Shawn 20:44, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The thing is, they aren't notable at all. They simply graduated from the school and came back to teach. For example, life-long scholar? I've been a student all my life, so why wouldn't I qualify as a life-long scholar? In regards to the state-champs: they aren't notable either. Why don't we include all the state champs in every sport/forensics/chess teams/ad nauseum? There needs to be a line drawn, and including high school students who can tell good stories does not qualify them for being notable. It doesn't lessen their achievements not to be listed on wikipedia, it just doesn't make them encyclopedic. I also will pose a question: are the only acheivements from East related to the forensics team? Have they nothing else that is notable? If so, why aren't you adding the names of the students for each team that wins conference, takes second in conference, etc.? I appreciate that you have great pride in your school (and you should), but randomly listing people on the webpage b/c you like them is not a good reason to list them. --PaddyM 00:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

• You do make a good arguement, I guess that in an effort to note anything relevant to the school would be my goal. Why I don't list other things is because I am not knowledgable of the school's other acheivements. Others are welcome to contribute on those matters. I am not randomly listing people either, in fact a lot of the people on the page i don't know or aren't even friends with. So to suggest that I am inserting people's names just to publicise them would be incorrect. I appreciate your efforts to make a good article but I still think that these are notable. At the very least, I think it's reasonable to note faculty alumni. Perhaps we can shrink the national competition section and the state competition section. Thanks again, Shawn 00:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

--Shawn 03:06, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Please read WP:NN and/or Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People still alive. Cheers. --BaronLarf 16:36, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

I know very well the policy, but i still argue it is notable. But since it's Wiki policy i don't really have a choice now do I? --Shawn 16:45, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Credits

I removed the listing of the school's credit requirements. This is an encyclopedia, not a student handbook. --mtz206 01:09, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

So we sugar coat things here at wikipedia? Thanks Blnguyen

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brookfield East High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100106023219/http://www4.uwm.edu:80/alumni/awards/distinguished_09_hibler.cfm to http://www4.uwm.edu/alumni/awards/distinguished_09_hibler.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

What this is

It appears some people have a misconception of what this is. This is Wikipedia's encyclopedia article on the school. It is not the school's page on Wikipedia. This is not social media. The purpose of this page is not to inform students or locals of what is available at the school. That is what the school's webpage is for. An encyclopedia is a tertiary source. That means that, except for the most mundane of material, everything here has to be verifiable to a reliable source, independent of the school. It is not a directory. It is not a newspaper.

What does that mean?

1. Unless you can provide a reliable source, independent of the school, leave it out.
2. For information like bond issues, controversies, etc, unless you can show with reliable sources that it was covered over time by sources removed from the general area the school is located, leave it out.
3. Information that is directory in nature, we do not include. That includes description of curriculum, grad rates, listings of clubs. Listings of sports offered are allowed, as coverage of sports in the US is a given. However, we only list achievements of the highest level and only team achievements. That means anything less than a team state championship, we do not include. You can reference a listing of athletic teams (or academic teams, or fine arts programs, such as band) to the school, but an independent source would be preferred (For Wisconsin, a good choice would be the WIAA). Any achievement MUST have an independent source. Again, we don't care what the school has to say about itself.

Students and alumni are welcomed and encouraged to edit this article, but only if you can keep the above in mind. Otherwise, you will be in violation of our policies on conflicts of interest.

If there are disagreements over content, they should be brought to this talk page and discussed until a consensus is reached. Please do not just replace it. Come here, and make arguments based in reliable sources and informed by Wikipedia policies and guidelines, until either one side is persuaded or a compromise is reached. That is how Wikipedia exercises editorial control and it works. Keep on topic, don't take it or make it personal, and it usually works. If it doesn't, there are dispute reconciliation mechanisms available. John from Idegon (talk) 18:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)