Talk:Broad arrow

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GrindtXX in topic Prison Use

Use for British Government Property

edit

This was pretty inadequate so I added some info I gleaned from the net but I am very uncertain of dates etc and you will notice references clash. Our Board of Ordnance article is pretty vague too. Feel free to jump in...Gwinva? Mhicaoidh (talk) 04:39, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

A 1698 Act is said to have legitimised the mark, I can see it here [1] but not here List of Acts of Parliament of the English Parliament, 1660 to 1699 Mhicaoidh (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

[[2]] is of interest.Mhicaoidh (talk) 01:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Regarding Parliament Acts of 1711, 1722 and 1772 - its surprisingly hard to verify titles, years, content and effects. Mhicaoidh (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

well, I have found evidence that there has been a claim flying around that the symbol predates the use by Sidney since at least the 19th century, but this doesn't seem to be based on anything solid. This article's claim appears to have been mostly based on this page. Well, the sign simply consists of three converging lines. You can't go around and treat any example of three converging lines incised somewhere as "proof" that the sign was used before Sidney's time. What is needed here is a reference to credible, academic secondary literature which states as much. No amount of imagery of artefacts adorned with three converging lines is going to help here. --dab (𒁳) 13:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
Modern replicas of various medieval European arrowheads
The "three converging lines" are intended to represent the arrow head from the arrows used with an English longbow - see bottom arrow head pictured at left. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.173.52 (talk) 15:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Use in characterisation of internal combustion engines

edit

Surely this paragraph does not belong on this page, but rather on the page about W engines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_engine. Kiltpin (talk) 18:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

You would think so right, therefore very intriguing. Thus1king (talk) 22:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Broad arrow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Broad arrow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Prison Use

edit

This is mentioned for Australia, but not for Britain. Prison clothes with broad arrows all over them were a notable feature of the UK penal system, and this should be mentioned in the article. 24.4.136.172 (talk) 18:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

From the article, section "Use for British Government property", subsection "Later use": "The broad arrow was routinely used on British prison uniforms from about the 1830s onwards." (with reference). There's also an illustration. GrindtXX (talk) 21:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply