Talk:British Rail Class 314/Archive 1

They'll be staying til 2015?

The article seems to have been changed to say that the Class 314 will be staying in service til 2015 but there's no source for this. Is this just speculation or has SPT actually made an announcement on it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackster (talk • contribs) 21:22, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Future

This section seems to no longer make any sense. It mentions various possible future scenarios but it doesn't contain any references whatsoever, one of which, the Class 458 cascade, appears to be complete rubbish. Perhaps this section should be cleaned up with solid reliable references added. 82.11.155.144 (talk) 23:34, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Possible change to the title of this article

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 314. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007185939/http://www.rharchive.info/Issue264HIGH.pdf to http://www.rharchive.info/Issue264HIGH.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)