Talk:Briarcliff Manor Public Library/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Acalycine (talk · contribs) 11:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Definitely broad, as it covers a large amount of history of the library, etc.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   Significant amount (6) of images, which are relevant and help to illustrate the text.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   A very comprehensive article. Worthy of GA status. Was enjoyable to review and read'

Fixed and added a ref to the community center info. Thanks for adding those refs, I'm not sure why I left them out...--ɱ (talk · vbm) 18:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, that was very fast.--ɱ (talk · vbm) 22:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

No problem, it was that well-written that I could review it so fast! Acalycine^{(talk/contribs)} 05:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)