Talk:Breton Ballads/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Drmies in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CommanderWaterford (talk · contribs) 17:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


The only possible "issue" someone could imagine is the Quote of Linda Gowans, in a review for the "Jahrbuch für Volksliedforschung", I guess the quote was in german (was not able to fetch it) (?) per mos:foreignquote. Everything else looks fine.

  • CommanderWaterford, the first three episodes of Handmaid's Tale dropped, and I gotta say, you have not gotten any better as a human being. Very sad. The quote from Gowans is from the last paragraph of the article (which is in English): "The book has deservedly been awarded The Folklore Society's Katharine Briggs Prize for 1996 - a laurel on which one trusts that Constantine will not long be allowed to rest. She has provided a pioneering guide to an exceptionally perilous forest, and the results of her exploration of new trails will be eagerly awaited." Thanks for the review--I appreciate it! Drmies (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply