Talk:Bredon Hill Hoard

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Value edit

Is there any estimate yet of the market value? How much is the musuem planning to appeal for? These details could perhaps be added to the article. Thanks. 109.155.134.117 (talk) 21:27, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

No real point in speculating on what it will be valued at (no doubt the "quality" newspapers will have a go), and the museum have stated that "We do not yet know what the value will be however it will not be low". You can probably make an educated guess by comparison with the Frome Hoard which was valued at £320,250 for 52,503 coins from the same period -- so about £25,000 I suppose, but if the coins are better quality the value may be higher. However we'll need to wait for the Treasure Valuation Committee before we can put a value in the article. BabelStone (talk) 21:58, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unclear? "The excavation showed that the hoard had not been buried in the open, as is the case with most Roman hoards, but had been deposited in the remains of a villa."

Is it the case with most Roman hoards thet they are not buried in the open? Or am I being obtuse? NitPicker769 (talk) 06:14, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree, it is not worded very well, and so have changed it so that the meaning should now be clear. BabelStone (talk) 00:48, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bredon Hill Hoard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bredon Hill Hoard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply