This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article title refers to it as the "Boulton & Paul Overstrand," but the text says it was the "Boulton Paul Overstrand." I've also seen the airplane referred to as the "Boulton-Paul Overstrand" and the "Boulton and Paul Overstrand." So which is it, Wiki?173.62.39.116 (talk) 00:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
The confusion is caused by the comapny changing its name just as the Overstrand was being built. Before 1934 it was "Boulton & Paul" it then become "Boulton Paul Aircraft". This equally confuses all the reliable sources who use the "as designed" comapny name or the "as built" company name sometimes in the same article. MilborneOne (talk) 12:25, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
