Talk:Borough of Darlington

Link to campaign site

It is my understanding that the inclusion of an external link to a site promoting a political campaign is at odds with the Wikipedia rules. I am referring to the Darlington Referendum campaign link. Am I wrong, or is this inappropriate? --Kev 22:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I have removed the offending link. --Kev 15:28, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

A little detail regarding the Darlington Referendum Group:- Group members have the single aim of organising a petition to be presented to Darlington Borough Council demanding a local referendum on the question of whether Darlington should have a directly-elected Mayor. Once a valid petition has been received, the law requires the Borough Council to hold a referendum and be bound by the result. Election of a Mayor would only follow if the majority in the referendum are in favour. Under the Government’s reforms, this traditional role will always continue. What the reforms address is the question of executive power in the Council. Therefore the Group is non-political and thus not in breach of Wikipedia rules - unless I am wrong? 82.23.190.117 21:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)MikeJC

I would hardly call a campaign that seeks to change the way in which a local council is run "non-political". That aside, I believe that the use of an encyclopedia to promote any campaign is inappropriate. --Kev 17:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

The Referendum Group seek to allow the people of Darlington the opportunity to decide whether OR NOT a change should be made to the way the Council is run via a Referendum. The members of the Referendum Group cannot force the people to decide!

Fair use rationale for Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg

Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg

Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg

Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Borough of Darlington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060525140007/http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_economy/RegionalGVA.pdf to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_economy/RegionalGVA.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Borough of Darlington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20121223192433/http://www.aldc.org.uk/elections/local-elections/ to http://www.aldc.org.uk/elections/local-elections/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021130091335/http://www2.darlington.gov.uk/ to http://www.darlington.gov.uk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021130091335/http://www2.darlington.gov.uk/ to http://www.darlington.gov.uk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060820155600/http://www.visitdarlington.com/ to http://www.visitdarlington.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Merge of Darlington Borough and Town Article

Given apparently Middlesbrough isn't allowed a borough article. I think we should merge Darlington Borough page with the town article and have villages listed in a wards tab. Then that solves the argument. RailwayJG (talk) 20:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Honestly I wouldn't disagree with that. There are towns with only one article less deserving than Darlington to have two e.g. York and Sheffield. Eopsid (talk) 16:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)