Talk:Borough of Broxbourne

Split?

Think we should split this - one article for borough, one article for the town. Thoughts? Morwen - Talk 15:05, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

I agree. Haven't got the time right now, though. --JimmyTheWig 10:30, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

I moved the existing article to Broxbourne (borough) and created Broxbourne for the town article. I've been through the inward links and should have redirected them correctly. MRSC 21:51, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Borough of Broxbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070604180718/http://www.broxbourne.gov.uk:80/internet/0x0a14c85a_0x0000a57e to http://www.broxbourne.gov.uk/Internet/0x0a14c85a_0x0000a57e

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Inappropriate content for Wikipedia

Removed article "racisim" as its Inappropriate content for Wikipedia.

@149.22.15.80: Re [these edits], the topic is not itself inappropriate for Wikipedia (providing a suitably neutral POV is used), but I think the content would belong better in List_of_George_Floyd_protests_in_the_United_States. if I get time later I'll add it if nobody else gets to it first.

@TheImaCow: Ping as can see you're involved in reverting these edits.

Best, Darren-M talk 10:54, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

@TheImaCow: