Talk:Bohr–Mollerup theorem

Latest comment: 1 year ago by GhostInTheMachine in topic Not a good short description

Comment

edit

"[...] textbook on probability theory as Bollerup had thought it proven already." - Bollerup = Bohr or Mollerup? --pred 17:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I removed the text, as there is no point in it being here, as long as the name is incorrect. --pred 20:50, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
I've added the text back in with a correction that both authors published the textbook together, plus a reference to the textbook 128.232.231.16 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC).Reply

When?

edit

When was this theorem proven? --Jobu0101 (talk) 15:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Not a good short description

edit

User:GhostInTheMachine, your short description is not helpful. It applies to a thousand pages on Wikpedia. Walt Pohl (talk) 13:31, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please read the full guidelines at WP:SDCONTENTGhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:13, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply