GA fail edit
Overall, this is a nice article. However, a lot more work needs to be done. (talk) 20:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC) - The
lead to me is a little too short. It should probably be expanded enough to have around two or three more paragraphs added to it.:
Done --Tunebroker (talk) 19:55, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
The summary of his career, actually, could be trimmed and then placed into the lead, but only after a heavy trimming.: Done --Tunebroker (talk) 19:55, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- There is nothing about Tench's personal life. Where was he born? Where did he grow up? What got him interested in music, and the guitar?
- The article could use a copyedit, or even a peer review. There are some confusing spots in the article, and some of the prose is still a little confusing. : Done --Tunebroker (talk) 19:55, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
I can see that you've done an incredible amount of work on this article, but I feel that a lot more still needs to be done. Especially info about his personal life, and his early life. The article just jumps right away into his music career, and gets a little too detailed at some points. Like I said, a little more research into his personal life, as well as a copyedit and a peer review, and this article could certainly pass as a GA in its next review. But for now, the article still needs some work. Keep it up! CarpetCrawlermessage me 05:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- You've worked fantastically well on the Tench article and nodoubtedly deserved a better outcome. In my opinion the article is at a really good standard now. Of course, as you mentioned, it would be nearly impossible to get a good section together about his personal life at the time being. Hopefully when his solo project (whatever it is) is more publicised, some more info. could surface, but until then I'll scrape together anything I can find. Great work and thanks Kitchen roll (talk) 20:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)