Talk:Blood of the Prophets
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Blood of the Prophets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090406183002/http://www.umsl.edu:80/~wha/awards/winners.html to http://www.umsl.edu/~wha/awards/winners.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724012259/http://www.jwha.info/awards/2003book.asp to http://jwha.info/awards/2003book.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609212818/http://byustudies.byu.edu/showTitle.aspx?title=6825 to http://byustudies.byu.edu/showTitle.aspx?title=6825
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Blood of the Prophets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oupress.com/awardbooks.asp
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.umsl.edu/~wha/awards/winners.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081226141420/http://history.denverlibrary.org/about/bancroft.html to http://history.denverlibrary.org/about/bancroft.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oupress.com/bookdetail.asp?isbn=0-8061-3639-1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090210215036/http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=review&id=509 to http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=review&id=509
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Criticism section is problematic edit
The contents of the criticism section appear to be wholly sourced to LDS-associated groups. It's fine to mention that the LDS do not appreciate the book, but it is now presented as if this is mainstream criticism - it is not. This section needs to be reworked. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 05:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Since there has been no response, I have made some changes myself. I have not removed any of the criticism, but added some context (e.g., that all such criticism given is taken from sources directly linked to the LDS church) and changed some wordings that presented allegations in such criticism as unimpeachable facts to more neutral wordings. If anyone disagrees, I would be happy to see suggestions for improving the section. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 10:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)