Talk:Blakumen/GA1
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Wizardman in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Onel5969 (talk · contribs) 16:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Onel5969 review edit
- Overview: The article is generally well-written, with good organization. Good prose, no spelling or grammatical errors, no copyvios.
- Writing: The article is generally well-written, with good organization. The lead is short, and might be lengthened, but the article itself is short, and the lead is a brief summary of the entire article.
- References: Article is well-cited with independent, reliable sources.
- Scope: The article is comprehensive in the coverage of its very narrow subject.
- NPOV: The article does a good job of presenting the opposing views of different scholars
- Edit Wars: currently, except for a brief edit war from a single editor who was erroneously questioning sources since they were unavailable on-line (which is NOT a valid contention), the article's edit history is stable.
- Images: The two images add greatly to the article, and both have no copyright issues.
- Pass: On the whole, I would support this article for GA status. Onel5969 (talk) 16:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This isn't really much of anything in the way of a review, so I'm placing this back in the queue. Wizardman 00:04, 13 September 2014 (UTC)