Talk:Black market/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Offensive

I find the term "black market" offensive and believe it should be changed to "African American market".

Seconded. --Anonman 02:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

The Black in Black market has noting to do with skin colour, Black is seedy, dark shadowy, you wouldnt expect to buy weapons from a yellow or sparkly coloured market. 212.50.191.54 13:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

in the black market we also sell roby pots hw papers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.188.127.26 (talk) 00:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Term

I submit that it is not illegal to "avoid" lawful taxes but is illegal to "evade" lawful taxes. Suggest clarification of wording in article. 0201Reader 20:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)0201Reader

Good point. Changes made. Famspear 20:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Merge with The Black Economy

The Black Economy has a lot of redundant content. I propose we merge and redirect it here. Any objections? --Selket ^Talk 21:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Zero objections sir! Tazmaniacs

Yeah, go ahead & merge them. Kendanielone 17:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

support merger Maxkon 23:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I am going to merge these articles now, please refrain from editing.Angelbo ^{Talk / Contribs} 12:46, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Merge complete. Angelbo ^{Talk / Contribs} 14:02, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Request for assessment

I noticed the post in the Economics WikiProjects for re-assessment. I think this is really close to a B-class as it has a good amount of information. Things that held it back for me... Refs. You need more references and use the same format on all of them. There is a mix of footnote and embedded hyperlink - go with the footnote format - see (WP:FOOT). Consider using the Citation templates which will format and link them. Review WP:GTL and WP:HEAD - Things are out of order and could be titled better (article title is in headers...). See if there are any WikiMedia sister projects that discuss the underground economy and add the appropriate tag. Would be nice to have some numbers about the size of these markets from countries around the world. Maybe something like... Economists estimate the underground economy in the United States to be between one and three trillion dollars annually. Clean up the lead - it seems too large for this article and should provide a good summary. The entire bit from the Clearstream scandal down should probably be in a sub-section and not in the lead but for summary (see WP:LEAD). I'd probably merge the talk from the Black Market as appose to providing a link (create an archive off of this article and put it in there). I'll copyedit when I have a chance. Morphh ^(talk) 14:42, 05 May 2007 (UTC)

comment

Seriously, how is the link to www.blackmarketdata.com not relavent to the content of Underground economy? You have other links that provide less of a service than this site. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blackmarketdata (talk • contribs) 17:24, 9 May 2007. — Blackmarketdata (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

moved preceding comment from top to bottom of talk page -Angelbo ^{Talk / Contribs} 20:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Underground Market Price

I removed the follow from the "Underground Market Price" section.

"Alternatively, the government could attempt to decrease demand. However, this is economically out of fashion and not as simple a process as decreasing supply.

The term "Underground Market" also applies to illegal monetary exchange outside the authorized institutes (Banks or Legal Exchange Offices)."

The first is irrelevant, and has nothing to do with the topic.

The second doesn't apply to this section in particular, someone can move to a more appropriate one if they wish. Harley peters 23:50, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Spiv

It is not very useful having links from the word 'Spiv' which just redirect to this page. The origin and use of the word Spiv is itself interesting. Chemical Engineer 05:26, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

I have to agree with you, "spiv" should have its own article. Spivs were a notable aspect of British society during the rationing years after the second world war. There was a recent BBC programme about this, I think it was a BBC4 programme. LDHan 17:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Total estimate of shadow economy?

I'd like to see good estimates of the degree to which the total underground economy has grown plus predictions for further growth. Brian Pearson 13:41, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

There are cites in the FairTax article giving estimates at $3 trillion. If somebody has the time, I think it would improve the article. Brian Pearson 01:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Needs serious work.

This article in general is low-quality, uncited, original research, and pushes a libertarian/sympathetic viewpoint. Additionally, no less than 10 out of 11 external references refer to "smoke-easies" or bars and establishments that flout smoking bans, which is at best very tenuously related to the topic of the article. This is ridiculous. NTK (talk) 01:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Would you please tag the parts that are POV? --Explodicle (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm moving a comment, in italics below, about the article that was embedded in the "edit" page to this page so we can all best discuss it. My comments are below:

Sorry, but this is scarcely intelligable; for example, category three: how is that (seemingly) anti-welfare State claim(?) related to Underground Economy? The fact that the section title does not use lower case, is indicative that this was added by an inexperienced editor. Remember: aim at readability and accessibility for the average reader. Try to avoid obscure and otherwise eclectic exposition. Aim at lucid prose that clearly establishes relationship with the topic

My take: I'm for keeping the categories, although they need not be under their own heading. The categories are referenced to a well known, respected institution and the particular publication been widely cited in academia. Given the article has been tagged for a dearth of references, I'd say let's keep the good ones. As for the "anti-welfare state claim", in the US, persons accepting transfer payments such as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families must meet income and other guidelines. Accepting aboveboard, paid employment can render one ineligible for government assistance, thus many recepients supplement their income in the underground economy. This phenomenon was widely cited in 1980's and early 1990's welfare studies (see, for instance, http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=1071 and still applies to some extent today, although the welfare reform act of 1996 changed things. SONORAMA (talk) 11:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

I too find it rather libertarian. Personally I am a libertarian, but I think the section on "Appearance and Disappearance" particlarly biased-- this is covered by the linked article to drug liberalization; pro points should not be made here (or indeed anti points). Similarly the "--justifiably--" in the first sentence of the article is POV-- I think-- I suppose is justifiable but not sure a NPOV would agree with the justification.

I will make some minor clean-up to grammar etc; I am UK english so have to tread warily altering the English but some really threw me. SimonTrew (talk) 11:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Remove example

In other cases, illegal transportation providers have effected change in mainstream transportation. For example, "Chinatown" bus companies, which introduced low-cost bus or van service between major American cities without using existing bus terminals, have thrived while traditional bus companies declined. Many Chinatown bus companies are now operate legitimately, although without the high capital costs of maintaining public bus terminals.

But was this illegal?

Roadrunner (talk) 19:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Please edit the paragraph about copyright goods

Why does it say "In third world countries, particularly the United States of America, where copyright laws are loosely enforced....?? It is true street vendors sell bootlegs on street corners in large cities in the USA, but to imply that the USA is third world and also to imply that copyright laws are not enforced in the USA is far from the truth. Perhaps the laws of intellectual property/copyrights are enforced more so in the USA than in any other country. Please review and edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.71.110.36 (talk) 03:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Etymology

Is it worth adding a section on how/where the terms originate? Why is it the "black market" or the "underground market" as apposed to, say, "private market" or similar... -- ratarsed (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

More reasons for prece differences

"Alternatively, illegally supplied goods may be more expensive than normal prices, as the product in question is..." scarce? Could you please add that? --190.135.36.211 (talk) 02:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Clearstream

Suggest delete this section, I don't see how it warrants being put on a general topic discussion. SimonTrew (talk) 14:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Cash in Hand

Why does Cash in Hand redirect here? I've always understood Cash in Hand to mean payment for employment via cash rather than electronic means. 115.69.13.166 (talk) 07:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

No, it means (at least in the UK) payment without accounting to taxes and other deductions that the employer is supposed to make- the employment is "off the books". This generally implies that the work is done by someone not why receives no employment right. Strictly it is not illegal, since if the worker then goes on to declare the earnings etc it is all perfectly legal (they are simply a self-employed sole trader) but in practice of course that rarely happens. The employment is thus untraced and well falls within the topic "Underground Economy".

People who receive their money in cash but are "on the books", that would not be described as being "cash in hand". The actual medium of payment is irrelevant-- an electronic transfer, or payment in kind, would still be described as "cash in hand".

Perhaps we should explain this better in the article. SimonTrew (talk) 09:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

List of cities?

Someone has added a list of 55 (now 57) "locations identified by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement as epicenters of illegal activity". Whoa. This screams out for a citation, where is it? Furthermore, I've been to many of the cities on this list and find them to be peaceful, attractive places - not denizens of criminality. If the US ICE actually puts out such as list, what is it really rating? Criminal activity? Unreported economic activity? Epicenters of economic crimes? Or what? Unless someone can produce a legitimate citation source and fix up the definition, I'll delete the entire list by the end of this week. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SONORAMA (talk • contribs) 08:02, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do. --Da Vynci (talk) 18:51, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Organ Trade?

Isn't there a big black market for organs? --MosheA (talk) 02:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

How came poeple do drugs and go to jail if you say that smoking it is not illegal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.7.71.237 (talk) 03:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Endangered wildlife?

This article has a glaring flaw in that it does not mention at all any illegal trade in bushmeat, animal parts, or skins, or the illegal pet trade, or illegal logging, all of which are enormous black market industries today. --APV8837 (talk) 10:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

It sure should have a large mention of that. I'm not an experienced editor, so I won't try anything. 81.226.229.158 (talk) 13:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Human Trafficking?

Why no mention of the sex slave market? Or of illegal migration?

Legal Documentation

Why no mention of usage of the black market for the acquisition of forged legal documentation such as passports or driver licenses?

Total value

Has anyone ever attempted to but a dollar figure on how much the underground economy is worth per year? There isn't any mention of this in the article and it makes it difficult to understand how relatively important it is compared to the aboveground economy. Smartse (talk) 00:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Largest black markets

The table for largest black markets is a bit dubious for various reasons. To begin with, the size of these markets are extremely hard to estimate, as they are black markets. But as a simple "sanity-check" estimate, there is no way that the market for software piracy is about the same as the market for smuggled cigarettes. A single pirated copy of Windows, for example, retails for hundreds of dollars. Are there really ~10 CARTONS of cigs smuggled for every pirated copy of Windows? Not to mention much more expensive software (Photoshop, CAD programs, MATLAB, Mathematica, etc.)...More to the point, though; the only source listed gives a 404 error. If no other sources can be produced it should be removed.--98.164.227.143 (talk) 05:48, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I think the table is adequate for this article. If you actually click on the sources (I'm not getting a 404 error), you won't need to do a simple "sanity-check" and see what is being reported. The source says that 600 billion cigarettes are sold illegally each year, or up to 11 percent of all cigarettes sold. Unless there is another source that you find that agrees with your sanity check estimate, then it should remain. The sources state what is reported, not what we think the size of a black market is. Evanmcmike (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC).

Since the Black market is a special case of an "underground economy", I think it would be most useful to Change the subject heading from Black market to Underground economy and then allow a separate section to discuss issues pertaining specifically to black markets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kgelfman (talk • contribs) 16:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Better formatting for the first paragraph?

It's rather unwieldy. I propose breaking it down into something a little bit more managable. Mr. Paramecium (talk) 06:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Merging black market with 'Informal sector'

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was oppose. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

---

There is a suggestion on the wiki page that the article on the 'informal sector' be merged with 'the black market'. I think this is a good idea, however, given that the term 'Informal Sector' is gaining international currency (it's the term which most formal institutions use) I would suggest that the 'Black Market' be nested under it. Same applies to 'underground economy' which I'd say is also a common or slang term for the informal sector. Mitrarose (talk) 09:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

oppose I wrote some of the current lede. If someone is willing to do the work, on the general principle of deploring folk terms when internationally accepted alternatives appear would support a merge. However Informal Sector is much larger, both in current fact and principle, than what is generally associated with "black market" as general economic activity outside of the "official" economy . Guess I oppose merge for that reason and because OTOH, at this time, this is probably the most important/noteworthy part of that sector. So should be section there linking main here and probably is so. Also there's an OR issue in Wikipedia making a determination of the distinction or lack thereof between the two. I only wrote the 1st ¶. Suggest links at top of each to the other and leave it at that for now. 72.228.189.184 (talk) 02:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

oppose Since both are very much different. Some sectors are menial like running local shops, small scale farming, handicrafts etc so that they won't pay taxes. Not that they are deliberately evading tax and running a parallel economy. Please remove the merge suggestion template from the page Informal sector ASAP. Aravind V R (talk) 11:29, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

oppose Black market is just one aspect of the informal sector. Datu Dong (talk) 15:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Size of the black markets

Can someone redesign this to include only the major black markets (arms, human trafficking, drugs, animal trade ) ?

move info on:

• Marijuana
• Cocaine
• Opium and heroin
• Prescription drugs

to illegal drug trade

Move info on the size of the markets of

• Prostitution
• Counterfeit technology products
• Counterfeit pharmaceutical drugs
• Web Video piracy
• Software piracy
• Cigarette smuggling

to their appropriate article

109.130.199.88 (talk) 15:16, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

black economy

It's quite unbelievable that Wikipedia doesn't have an article on the black economy = underground economy. It is not at all the same thing as the black market and it should not be redirected to that article.

This article plagiarizes one of its sources and surreptitiously changes "underground economy" to "black market" to fit this article's confusion between these different concepts. --

I have a feeling you're an agorist. Fellow agorist here. The black-market fits within the underground economy right next to grey-markets. 12:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Counterfeit food

This still needs to be mentioned, see See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3022567/posts

It mostly involves counterfeit high-end products, such as very valuable wine/wine bottles, low quality meat sold as high-quality, ... and regular food sold as biofood. In most cases, there isn't a danger for human health/poisoning, but in some extreme cases this has been the case nonetheless. 109.130.163.110 (talk) 08:01, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Dr. Cebula's comment on this article

Dr. Cebula has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

Emphasis should be added regarding the role and magnitude of income tax evasion (as opposed to simple and legal tax avoidance) and its size relative to the other components of the underground economy..

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Cebula has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:

• Reference : Cebula, Richard, 2014. "Where Has the Currency Gone? And Why? The Underground Economy and Personal Income Tax Evasion in the U.S., 1970-2008," MPRA Paper 55284, University Library of Munich, Germany.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 23:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

EU move to tally illicit drugs in GDP

From 2014: http://www.wsj.com/articles/sex-drugs-and-gdp-the-challenge-of-measuring-the-shadow-economy-1402251721 Yadojado (talk) 22:45, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Dr. Meon's comment on this article

Dr. Meon has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

- There seems to be an Anglo-Saxon bias in examples. There are, for instance, several references to England and Wales, that are interesting, but lack generality. - Many bibliographical references are from Edgar Feige. He is a respected scholar in the field, but it is odd that other equally respected scholars are not cited, e.g. Friedrich Schneider.

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

We believe Dr. Meon has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:

• Reference : Axel Dreher & Pierre-Guillaume Meon & Friedrich Schneider, 2007. "The devil is in the shadow : Do institutions affect income and productivity or only official income and official productivity?," KOF Working papers 07-179, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 15:57, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Organised crime

Perhaps some ideas on how to disrupt the trade system of illegal products can be mentioned. See an example at Talk:Wildlife_trade#Abalone_traded_for_arms 109.130.199.88 (talk) 15:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Oppose: Wikipedia is not a law-enforcement how-to book AshleyWaffle (talk) 12:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

I don't think law enforcement's relationship with black markets is un-encyclopedic. Governments are involved for example in the War on Drugs, in fighting smuggling, in fighting "trato", the trafficking of sex-slaves, and so on. The black market for atomic research is fought against famously by assuring good wages to all nuclear scientists, especially with the end of the soviet union and it's economic power leaving many nuclear physicists a bit precarious, I don't remember the name of this specific program but I remember it exists.

However the specific link about abalone seems more like original research than actual encyclopedic ways in which black markets are fought against.

--User:Dwarf Kirlston - talk 18:34, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Consequences section

This is horribly named. There are three subsections; war, Indian black money and prohibition. The first and third (war and prohibition) are causes of the formation of black markets, not a consequence. I would rename it myself immediately, but the black money subsection does not belong under a section titled "causes". India's black money problem does appear to be a consequence of other black market trade. So it may belong under a real "consequences" section, which lists other consequences of black market activity. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Hey there Athomeinkobe! I agree it is horribly named. And I've thought a bit about it. Prohibition is already mentioned in Traded Goods and Services under Alcohol. "Regional Issues" or "Black Markets by Nation" could be a section for India's notable black market issue, about half of Brazil's economy is informal, and it also has severe problems with corruption, as well as many other countries, so India would not be alone by a long shot. And maybe Wars could be put inside the current "background" or in a new section "Causes" under other causes like "taxation/tariffs", "excessive regulation", "government control of markets" and "corruption". That's my general suggestion.--User:Dwarf Kirlston - talk 18:20, 29 November 2016 (UTC)