This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
They're all just abbreviations and as a reader who is not an expert on the subject matter I have absolutely no idea what they are intended to indicate or how to follow up on them. Folly Mox (talk) 21:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
OK so every cite (and, indeed, the full text of the article) is verbatim the Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography (Template:DGRG!) entry. I've checked out the front and back matter of that work and, as far as I've been able to determine, the expansions of the abbreviated citations in that work (and they are all abbreviated) are neither defined in any standalone section nor when they first appear in the text, as if the Dictionary had been written exclusively for subject matter experts from the mid-1800s. Does anyone in MilHist have any experience with this? Folly Mox (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply