Talk:Bipolar disorder research

Links to Ongoing Research Seeking Participants

I have reinstated links after deletion by 'whatamidoing'. In the interests of transparency, I am a researcher on the Maudsley Bipolar Disorder Study. I also initiated this section several years ago on the main page, with the intention that all researchers could add their studies under the section. The links were moved to the new research, which is sensible. I believe these links are worth having as they help improve our understanding of the disorder.

It is possible that the seection could be divided into subsections such as 'publically funded', 'clinical trial's' etc. However, given there are only three studies so far, this seems unnecessary. I have however added (to our study) a reference to funding, and I would recommmend this for other studies.

Another idea would be to add a dedicated page for ongoing research... FergusKane —Preceding undated comment was added at 03:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC).

References

The format of this article needs revision badly. There should be a reference section. DPeterson^talk 13:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I added some more recent content to some areas and added the reference section. Steven Viemeister - rtisbute 02:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Tags

I've tagged this article because "research" is very vague and as a result the article is containing a wide range of loosely collected points, much of which are probably better covered under a more specific heading/article (as per changes just made to main bipolar article), and the content which is most directly related to the term seems to comprise an unencyclopedic listing/advertising of studies seeking to recruit participants. The article also doesn't have a lead. EverSince (talk) 08:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Bipolar disorder

Patient has been diagnosed in 2009 with bipolar disorder. Medication is administered daily. Patient is in good health(normal) for 4-5 months and has a slip in behavior. The husband claims that the med's is administered regular throughout and not skipped at all but the patient still seems to have a set back. The patients med's stays the same and is not changed at all; is it right in sayign that the patient seem to be cutting down on her med's during the normal cycle? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.96.15.110 (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)