Talk:Big Picture Science

Merger Suggestion

I don't agree with it, whoever proposed the merger. Seth Shostak doesn't host the programme alone.--TheBearPaw (talk) 00:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:35, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Are We Alone? → Big Picture Science – Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:48, 18 July 2011 (UTC) The Podcast's name has been changed to "Big Picture Science" 67.166.109.208 (talk) 19:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

• Comment is it the same show, or a new format taking over the show's slot? 65.93.15.213 (talk) 07:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Big Picture Science

The program is now running with the new title "Big Picture Science", so I see no reason not to make the move. TomS TDotO (talk) 16:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big Picture Science. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001041153/http://radio.seti.org/pages/about_the_show to http://radio.seti.org/pages/about_the_show

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Notability

I was looking into whether this article meets WP:GNG before deciding whether to open an AfD. Shostak has written articles for news.wjct.org, space.com, seti.org, nbcnews.com, and nytimes.com so finding independent and reliable secondary sources is difficult, but I found sources that I believe satisfy WP:100WORDS and WP:THREESOURCES and figured I should mention them in the talk page for future use:

• Geek Wire
• Washington Post
• Earth Magazine
• Stuff.co.nz

TipsyElephant (talk) 14:40, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Coming back to this a year later and the Geek Wire and Stuff sources are terrible. They just name check the show. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)