Talk:Biblical Witness Fellowship

Criticism of UCC statements

The article currently says:

BWF has consistently voiced its criticism of UCC statements regarding things they believe to be contrary to the Bible, especially the advocation of rights for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people.

That makes it sound like BWF is against rights for GLBTs, which is untrue. They oppose same-sex marriage and sodomy, but that is not the same thing as opposing rights for GLBTs. It might be accurate to say they oppose UCC statements advocating "special rights" for GLBTs, but even that would need documentation to support it.

For now I'm going to change it to simply say "social issues." Hopefully that wording will not offend anyone. Perhaps someone would like to add additional specific examples of UCC statements that BWF opposes? That would be good.

BTW, by way of full disclosure, I'm a refugee from the UCC. I'm not a member of BWF, because I left the UCC denomination. Or, as Reagan said of the Democratic Party, "I didn't leave them, they left me." NCdave (talk) 10:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biblical Witness Fellowship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070410035027/http://biblicalwitness.org/fact_vs.htm to http://www.biblicalwitness.org/fact_vs.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Defunct?

This organization seems inactive. I suggest a rewrite to make the article past tense. Dirkwillems (talk) 00:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)